Case studies / Residential

Patrol completion from under 50% to over 85%.

625-unit condominium: patrol completion up from under 50% to over 85%.

Building
625-unit, two-tower condominium with gym and pool, urban
Period
About one year (reported January 2024)
Environment
Residential
For
Owners, boards and developers, Security leads and guard companies
<50%patrol completion before ARMS measurement
85%+patrol completion with the new provider
19.5 hrsa day of patrol-ready guard time, after desk duties such as packages
The problem

What the building was facing.

Patrols were being completed less than half the time, and nothing tracked it, so lapses went unaddressed. The board was paying for security coverage it was not receiving.

What ARMS did

From signal to record.

01

Phase one: measured the existing provider's patrols with ARMS. Completion was well below what the contract assumed.

02

Phase two: the board changed providers, choosing one willing to work to ARMS measurement.

03

ARMS analysis showed the site needed a full patrol three times every 24 hours, one per shift, each taking no more than 1.5 hours.

04

With one guard on site around the clock, and desk duties such as packages taking the rest, about 19.5 hours a day were available for patrol, and the security contract was restructured around it.

Results

What changed.

Patrol completion rose to a consistent 85% or higher.

Security cost stayed the same; the saving came through lower insurance payments for as long as ARMS was in the building.

The security contract was rebuilt around what the building actually needed.

A patrol record and a patrol are not the same thing until something verifies it.

What this case shows

See the record for a building like yours.